> Le 20 sept. 2016 à 14:59, Jean-Roch Blais <blaisjeanr...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Hello again, > >> m also glad it works for me, :-), thank you, but if there is a latent >> problem with apparently dnsmasq, shouldn’t a regression like that be >> reported to the maintainer/creator/author ? > It use to work quite well before (I’m not even sure of that anymore :-( ), as > you can tell from my first mail, when I tried a previous version of dhcpcd. > Should someone run more > tests to make sure dnsmasq is the problem, before contacting the author, > should I ???, can I ???… , > I’m warning you :-), I’m no expert ! and I would gladly and happily relie on > gurus ! (I’m also a bit lazy as you can guess :-)) > > Finally as Andrew points out, if there a potential for trouble, which I don’t > quite understand, shouldn't it be corrected ? for the future generations ! > > jrb > >>> Erich >> Oops, I hadn’t read Erich answer to Andrew, it didn’t show in my e-mails:
*This can happen anytime, so the dnsmasq daemon should watch changes at *least in the resolv.conf file and reconfigure if this happens. I don't *know if it does. * *We might need a generic control daemon, which watches changes in *configuration files and triggers reconfiguration or restart of daemon *processes. So my questions are partly answered and I see you have given it some thoughts already, thanks ! jrb >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >> Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
