You may even improve power efficiency using PSU with APFC and with lower max power (= lower standby losses in transformers) :)
On 28.11.2016 03:35, jean-roch blais wrote: > Hello again List, I just revised my calculations for the power, it turns > out assuming the current pulse is square add too much error, I integrated > the pulse manually on the scope using 18 samples separated by 0.1 mSec, > adding all that and spreading it over 8 mSec (= 1/60 cycles / 2 ), the > current pulse becomes equivalent to 460 ma. So the power consumed is now = > 55.3 watts. This is slightly better than the previous figure of 81 watts. > At 7ยข a kwatt-hours this gives 34 canadian $. Ok I won't bug you'all with > that any longer... > jrb. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >> Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/ >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
