Magnus Danielson wrote: >Zefram skrev: >>UTC ticked some 63072000.107757997 seconds in that time. Of greater >>relevance is that UTC ticked exactly 730 days (as you indicate). > >You mean to say it ticked 93072000.107757997 SI seconds in that time?
No. In that time there were exactly 63072001.999918 TAI seconds; the number of SI seconds is very close to that. But there were about 93072000.107757997 *UTC* seconds (exactly 63072000+10775800/100000003 UTC seconds, in fact). >Notice that we have several "seconds" here so we may need to qualify >them as "SI seconds", "TAI seconds" and "UTC seconds" to make language >clear for this particular era. Yes. Where I've said "YYY ticked Z.Z seconds" I meant, precisely, "there were Z.Z YYY seconds". -zefram _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
