On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Rob Seaman wrote: > > I do not believe the unstated magic timezone notion (if indeed that is > an idea motivating the authors of the draft in front of the ITU) can > work (or rather, I do not believe that this notion corresponds to a > solution of the problem).
It really depends whether you think easy access to a sub-second accurate realisation of UT1 is part of the problem. The proposed arrangement of local timezone offsets applied to an atomic timescale only gives you access to local mean solar time accurate to couple of hours or so, which is pretty useless for astronomy or astronavigation but is good enough for civil purposes since that is what the timezone system has given us for the last 50 or 100 years. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7, DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER IN HUMBER AND THAMES. MODERATE OR ROUGH. RAIN THEN FAIR. GOOD. _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
