On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 13:47, Tom Van Baak <[email protected]> wrote:
> You really didn't expect 250 diffeent atomic clocks around > the world to all agree at the ns level at all times did you? > <tounge-in-cheek> Why not? nano is 10E-9, and I see references to people trying for clocks with 10E-12 on this list. And what good is the "atom" part of an atomic clock, if it can't even handle "nano"? </foot-in-mouth> Still waiting for the flying cars I was promised ... -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
_______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
