The issue here is that redefining UTC would *also* make the definitions of "Universal Time" and "UT" highly ambiguous.
So I don't mean any of the techoverbiage you are referring to, and thus said TCFKAUT, not TCFKAUTC. The terms UT and UTC have been interchangeable for most purposes, along with other variations like GMT. The ITU seeks to break this symmetry. UT as usable vocabulary will go down with the ship. UT as a useful concept will remain. What will our dopplegangers call UT in this alternate future? Rob On Apr 11, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Steve Allen wrote: > On Mon 2011-04-11T10:00:20 -0700, Rob Seaman hath writ: >> To get back to the original question: in the part of the metaverse >> where UTC is redefined, and thus referring to something as "Universal >> Time" or "UT" is dangerously ambiguous, what do we call "TCFKAUT"? > > Which UTC do you mean? > > The one with leap seconds as defined by the series of documents ITU-R > TF.460 through TF.460-6? > > Or the one without leap seconds as defined by POSIX, IEEE P1003.1? > > Or the one in Android devices (which is really GPS time, not UTC)? _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
