On 12 Apr 11, at 0903, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <[email protected]>, Ian Batten 
> wri
> tes:
> 
>> and thereafter contracts would add "times in
>> this contract shall be assumed to be UTC" to the definitions section.
> 
> Don't forget that a lot of obscure contracts with large technical
> impact already states UTC explicitly:  Air Traffic Control, AIS
> Vessel tracking, telecoms accounting/settelment, NATO, meteology &c.

It will be interesting to find out if there are contracts which cite UTC by 
name and which also assume that UTC is a close-enough measure of angular 
position, rather than TAI+constant.

ian

_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to