In message <[email protected]>, Rob Seaman writes:
>Steve's point was clear. Clock adjustments were more frequent in >the past; evidence that the CCIR recognized that atomic frequency >standards and universal time clocks are two different phenomena. While that may have been the CCIR's position back then, that is a pretty vacuous argument, since the data and position dates back to before commercial atomic frequency standards were available, so it is not like the CCIR had any relevant facts before it, that could lead to any other conclusion. In related news: Henry the VIII. never picked sides in the debate over factory vs. free-range chickens. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
