Whoops. Never mind the "calling several things" part. I'm a Mac user and some things require Adobe software to read correctly. The rest of the sentence still seems correct, though.
Dennis Ferguson On 10 Jan, 2012, at 15:10 , Dennis Ferguson wrote: > > On 10 Jan, 2012, at 14:39 , Rob Seaman wrote: > >> Gotta love this equation: >> >> UT1 = UTC + UT1 + UT1 (t – tEOP) > > You do have to love it, because beyond calling several different things > UT1 (and unless I'm missing something, which is always possible) it seems > to imply either that they expect UTC to be leap-less by the time they are > finished doing this or that they have a leap second bug (or at least an > ambiguity) in their specification. The above suggests that the UT1 offset > needs to leap when UTC does, but I don't see where it says how that happens. > > Dennis Ferguson _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
