In message <[email protected]>, Nero Imhard writes:
>But at least you are saying it aloud. ITU isn't. Who would ITU be in that sentence ? ITU hasnt said anything about leapseconds since the last ratification of TF.460, and they won't do again, until some action in the general assembly takes place, because ITU only has the voice lent to it by the general assembly. You are consistently confusing the people/countries which have proposed changing TF.460, with this "nefarious ITU" which you accuse of not doing this or doing that. If you actually look at it, all ITU does is coordinate meetings and publish documents that come out of those meetings. The participants in the meetings who have proposed changing TF.460 is the representatives of the US government. If you feel they lack in the communications department, then complain about the US government, don't complain about ITU. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
