Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > The only game changer I can spot, is if Daniel Gambis starts to announce > leapseconds 30 months in advance with stated intention to get it up to five > years, as soon as the science supports DUT1<1s.
'Daniel Gambis said that the IERS could confidently predict leap seconds in advance of “two or three years.”' Bottom of page 1: http://www.cacr.caltech.edu/futureofutc/preprints/40_Roundtable_discuss_5.pdf Rob _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
