On 20 Jan 2012, at 15:36, Rob Seaman wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> The only game changer I can spot, is if Daniel Gambis starts to announce >> leapseconds 30 months in advance with stated intention to get it up to five >> years, as soon as the science supports DUT1<1s. > > 'Daniel Gambis said that the IERS could confidently predict leap seconds in > advance of “two or three years.”'
So why has there only been six months' notice of the June leapsecond in 2012? ian _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
