On Jan 18, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote: > On 18/01/14 11:56, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <[email protected]>, Magnus Danielson writes: >> >>> If you where right about not basing it on the orbital debris, then we >>> should not attempt to be using concepts like seconds, minutes, hours, >>> days, weeks, months, years [...] >> >> As you are no doubt aware, the POSIX time_t does not do that. > > The POSIX time_t still tries to encode it, using some of the rules that makes > of UTC, including SI-seconds. However, the argument was not about POSIX > time_t, but about what "Universal" in UTC actually means.
POSIX time_t is explicitly not UTC. Warner _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
