> I neglected to mention the URL for my revised paper. It is > > https://www.systemeyescomputerstore.com/proleptic_UTC.pdf > > John Sauter ([email protected])
Hi John, Given that your pUTC is pure fiction, though possibly useful fiction, did you consider a simple polynomial fit of the Morrison and Stephenson data, instead of those hideous, every-one-is-different, per-century and per-decade pseudo leap second tables of yours? I'll try to put my finger on it, but there's something troubling about taking a table that clearly contains numbers of very low precision and then creating a table with algorithms and dates of high resolution. I have more comments too, but let's start with this one. Thanks, /tvb _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
