Hal Murray wrote: >> Since RFC 5905 describes new, tagged, extended fields for the NTP >> protocol, this sort of extra information should be very easy to add. > > Nope. It's the same old problem. There is lots of existing installed gear > that doesn't know about the new fields.
Sure, but in this case, the new fields would be informational only, so it's not a problem if a given client doesn't grok them. (And the RFC 5905 extensions are, AFAIK, backwards compatible; older NTPv3 clients should cleanly ignore them. Any that don't will have other problems.) _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
