On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:31:22PM +0000, Markus Kuhn wrote: > > http://washingtontimes.com/upi/20050707-090936-2878r.htm
It would take of course, people as pedantic as those of us who have an interest in a leap second to point out that the article is wrong in its claim that " This year, 2005, will be one second longer than any year since 1998.", since 2000 and 2004 were leap years and were longer than 2005 by 86,399 seconds. :-) -- Randy Kaelber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Scientific Software Engineer Mars Space Flight Facility, Department of Geological Sciences Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
