On 27/04/2016 10:47, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 26/04/2016 18:51, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 17:16 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>>> This is just a test, please ignore.
>>
>> Hm, I thought I fixed the stupid mailman default when I set up the
>> list, to remove the pointless [LEDE-DEV] pollution from the subject
>> line. There are *proper* list headers to indicate that it's mailing
>> list traffic, without obscuring the subject.
>>
>> Shall I go fix it... or *had* I done so once, and you broke it again...
>> in which case can I ask you to reconsider?
>
> please fix it if you have the time :-) i did play with the settings a
> bit to get the moderation working properly and probably b0rked it on the
> way.
>
> John
Hi David,
some folks would prefer to have the prefix on the 2 lists. I just had a
look in the mailman settings and failed to quickly spot the location
where this can be achieved. could you flick the switch back please ?
Johnu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
