On 16-05-06 11:55 AM, Kus wrote: > >> Regarding signing commits with GPG key, it would be nice to recommend it but >> making it a requirement sounds like a barrier. > > I'd argue such a barrier is OK if we want to quickly increase the size of the > team of people with commit access. I think we're underestimating our > contributors here. I agree that we shouldn't have unnecessary barriers (such > as copyright assignment to give a specific example). > > I am getting mixed signals here though. Some people say requiring signing > causes friction and limits participation. Others say that there will only be > a couple of people who will ever have commit access so signing is unnecessary.
I'm now confused what the proposal is. I thought it was that everyone (including people doing pull requests, not just LEDE comitters) should be required to gpg sign commits. If it's just LEDE committers then that's a completely different ball game, and makes perfect sense. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
