Hi Waldemar, On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 14:12 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 14:55 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 17:46 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > > > > > > > > This fixes util-linux building with uClibc. > > > Patch is taken as it is from Buildroot: > > > https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/plain/package/util-linux/0001-Fix-libmount-build-under-uClibc.patch?id=baccb506a > > > 6f > > > ea > > > bf114623866568121f49712f5df > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrod...@synopsys.com> > > > --- > > > .../004-Fix-libmount-build-under-uClibc.patch | 153 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 153 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 > > > package/utils/util-linux/patches/004-Fix-libmount-build-under-uClibc.patch
We are discussing one issue with "util-linux" package building. The problem is in "util-linux" wants to use alloc modifier (either "%as" or "%ms") in scanf(). Looks like uClibc still doesn't support neither "%ms" nor "%as" (this one is obsolete glibc-specific so let's not bother with it anyways). Now to work-around this missing requirement we used to use an off-the-tree patch like this one in Buildroot: https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/tree/package/util-linux/0001-Fix-libmount-build-under-uClibc.patch OpenWRT: https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=blob;f=package/utils/util-linux/patches/001-no-printf-alloc.patch;h=ad9eef0 959bf0c8ce269e8039d4d05ef58e1d527;hb=8a7b28071fba84e297796c46d46e12b0967804e8 Gentoo: https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/util-linux/files/util-linux-2.21.1-no-printf-alloc.pat ch?revision=1.2 The question to you is where do you think we should fix mentioned problem: 1) In uClibc-ng with addition of "%ms" support in scanf or 2) Try to upstream mentioned patch in "util-linux"? Regards, Alexey _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev