Hi Waldemar, On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 19:28 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > Alexey Brodkin wrote, > > > > > Hi Waldemar, > > > > On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 14:12 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 14:55 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 17:46 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This fixes util-linux building with uClibc. > > > > > Patch is taken as it is from Buildroot: > > > > > https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/plain/package/util-linux/0001-Fix-libmount-build-under-uClibc.patch?id=baccb > > > > > 506a > > > > > 6f > > > > > ea > > > > > bf114623866568121f49712f5df > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrod...@synopsys.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > .../004-Fix-libmount-build-under-uClibc.patch | 153 > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 153 insertions(+) > > > > > create mode 100644 > > > > > package/utils/util-linux/patches/004-Fix-libmount-build-under-uClibc.patch > > We are discussing one issue with "util-linux" package building. > > The problem is in "util-linux" wants to use alloc modifier (either "%as" > > or "%ms") in scanf(). > > > > Looks like uClibc still doesn't support neither "%ms" nor "%as" (this one > > is obsolete glibc-specific so let's not bother with it anyways). > > > > Now to work-around this missing requirement we used to use > > an off-the-tree patch like this one in Buildroot: > > https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/tree/package/util-linux/0001-Fix-libmount-build-under-uClibc.patch > > > > OpenWRT: > > https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=blob;f=package/utils/util-linux/patches/001-no-printf-alloc.patch;h=ad9 > > eef0 > > 959bf0c8ce269e8039d4d05ef58e1d527;hb=8a7b28071fba84e297796c46d46e12b0967804e8 > > > > Gentoo: > > https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/util-linux/files/util-linux-2.21.1-no-printf-alloc > > .pat > > ch?revision=1.2 > > > > The question to you is where do you think we should fix mentioned problem: > > 1) In uClibc-ng with addition of "%ms" support in scanf or > I would prefer this solution. I have started reading the code, but I > can't give you any guarantee when I can work on this. > Do you have free resources to cook up a patch? :)
You mean if I'm up to implement this missing feature in uClibc? Well I'd like to but as well not sure if and when I have time for that :) For now we have a work-around with mentioned patches. So that's not a showstopper. -Alexey _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
