Is it really pushing a corporate agenda to coordinate efforts to make
LEDE/OpenWRT support remote management protocols?
Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil.
David Lang
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500
From: L. D. Pinney <[email protected]>
To: LEDE Development List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?
Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical
development issues.
Persons from prplfoundation et.al should respect conventional mail list
etiquette such as found here :
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php
Pay particular attention to 4, 7, and 10 on the above etiquitte list.
I see prplfoundation as a hostile takeover of LEDE / OpenWrt by a
corporate conspiracy.
Free Software is meant to be free ...
Free from the manipulation of governments and corporations.
Pushing your corporate backed agenda on the Development List(s)
torques me off every time.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Eric Schultz
<[email protected]> wrote:
As we continue the TR-069 support discussion, I wanted to ask folks
whether they want me to continue to cross post to these list in addition
to the prplwrt list at [email protected]. I have no
problem doing either way, but I don't want to fill people's inbox will
stuff they feel is off topic. Just wanted to get a sense of what people
would prefer.
Thanks,
Eric
--
Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation
http://www.prplfoundation.org
[email protected]
cell: 920-539-0404
skype: ericschultzwi
@EricPrpl
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
