On Friday, 10 February 2017 09:11:17 CET Dave Taht wrote: > Hans, jow, blogic, everybody... > > I have been pulling lede-head stuff and starting to build lede again > (for the first time in 3 years), but I'd given up on the ipv6 > issues[1]. > > After reviewing odhcpd/procd/etc latest git commits today, I'm impressed. > > My intent is to return to testing a few things this weekend - using > odhcpd as the default... if it is "ready enough"? Refactoring was done to make the odhcpd implementation more stable and less error prone; still further work is required to improve its behavior. > > 0) More wifi ATF work at scale (adding ipv6 back in as a first class test) > 0.1) cake profiling > > 1) IPv6 & comcast > 2) 6rd on sonic fiber > 3) DHCPv6-PD from an internal router to edgerouters and to lede > 4) Poking at multicast (uftpd flooding, primarily, but also babeld and mdns) > > About the biggest request from the field seems to be supplying RA and > dhcpv6 dns on a more real IPv6 address than fe80 to make android users > happier (https://github.com/dtaht/dnsmasq-lede/issues/11). My idea would be to first pass the ULA IPv6 address; next a GUA IPv6 address and finally the link local IPv6 address as DNS server
Hans > > Please let me know what I can best do to help, not be noisy, and stay > out of the way, and yet be useful. > > Thanks for jumping all over these issues! > > > [1] And ranting. TL;DR - https://github.com/dtaht/libv6 I am painfully > aware of how much ipv6 can suck. _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
