On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Philip Prindeville <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote: > >> On Feb 11, 2017, at 11:11 PM, Stijn Tintel <st...@linux-ipv6.be> wrote: >> >> On 10-02-17 18:11, Dave Taht wrote: >>> About the biggest request from the field seems to be supplying RA and >>> dhcpv6 dns on a more real IPv6 address than fe80 to make android users >>> happier (https://github.com/dtaht/dnsmasq-lede/issues/11). >> Is this only a problem for Android users? I ran into a bug a couple of >> times where dnsmasq simply did not reply to queries sent to IPv6 >> link-local addresses. I had this problem on my ERLs, it went away at >> some point, then it came back, and while testing now, it seems to work >> fine again. So unfortunately I have no idea why it happened, but that is >> the only reason I configured a non-ULA DNS server on these devices. >> >> It wasn't really a problem on my Linux clients, but using Android with >> IPv6 DNS servers that don't reply just isn't usable, even if the IPv4 >> DNS servers work just fine. Each connection attempt had a ~12 second >> delay or so. >> >> Stijn > > Somewhat off-topic, but I’m trying to update the isc-dhcp scripts to work > (they don’t). > > Is there documentation for what the UCI config for odhcpd looks like? I > might be able to use the same configuration (or something pretty close to it) > for synthesizing the /etc/dhcpd.conf file for ISC-DHCP. The README file of odhcpd has a description of the UCI config (https://git.lede-project.org/?p=project/odhcpd.git;a=blob;f=README;h=8c3b12c6c245c6b58cb8ac9dddf146144571af8c;hb=HEAD)
Hans > > Thanks, > > -Philip > > > _______________________________________________ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
