On 03/02/2017 11:35 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote: >> On 3 Mar, 2017, at 06:31, Eric Luehrsen <ericluehr...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> Also with SQM you may not what idealized entropy in your queue >> distribution. It is desired by some to have host-connection fairness, >> and not so much interest in stream-type fairness. So overlap in a few >> hash "tags" may not be always such a bad thing depending on how it works >> itself out. > That sort of thing is explicitly catered for by the triple-isolate algorithm. > I don’t want to rely on particular hash behaviour to achieve an inferior > result. I’d much rather have a good hash with maximal entropy. > > - Jonathan Morton That's not what I was going for. Agree, it would not be good to depend on an inferior hash. You mentioned divide as a "cost." So I was proposing a thought around a "benefit" estimate. If hash collisions are not as important (or are they), then what is "benefit / cost?"
_______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
