I am not seeing what you want.  The default ledger register format gives
something like this for entries with multiple accounts:

012/03/05 Pelican Parts        Expenses:Auto:Hobbies       $ 50.00      $
50.00
                                Expenses:Auto:Hobbies       $ 62.50     $
112.50
                                Expenses:Auto:Hobbies       $ 11.50     $
124.00
                                Assets:VWCU:Joint         $
-124.00            0
2012/04/03 Pelican Parts        Expenses:Auto:Hobbies       $ 86.90      $
86.90
                                Expenses:Auto:Hobbies        $ 7.50      $
94.40
                                Expenses:Auto:Hobbies        $ 5.00      $
99.40
                                Expenses:Auto:Hobbies      $ 158.00     $
257.40
                                Expenses:Auto:Hobbies        $ 5.00     $
262.40
                                Expenses:Auto:Hobbies        $ 7.50     $
269.90
                                Expenses:Auto:Hobbies       $ 95.75     $
365.65
                                Expenses:Auto:Hobbies       $ 18.75     $
384.40
                                Assets:VWCU:Joint         $
-384.40            0



On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 20:26, Doug Philips <[email protected]>wrote:

> Ok, here is an example (fixed width font needed):
>
> Given normal register output:
> (one entry shown, vastly summarized with two transactions where than
> can be 6-12 of the same type):
>
> 2012/02/08  Deposits  Assets:Checking:Memberships:2012     $fg.hi
> $total1   ; name of member1
>                      Assets:Checking:Memberships:2012     $fg.hi
> $total2   ; name of member2
>                      Assets:Checking:Event:A              $jk.lm    $total3
>                      Assets:Checking:Event:B              $jk.lm    $total4
>
>
> And then with -n:
>
> 2012/02/08  Deposits  <Total>                             $nop.qr
>  $total4
>
>
> What I'd like to see is:
> 2012/02/08  Deposits  Assets:Checking:Memberships:2012     $fg.hi
> $total1   ; name of member1
>                      Assets:Checking:Memberships:2012     $fg.hi
> $total2   ; name of member2
>                      Assets:Checking:Event:A              $jk.lm    $total3
>                      Assets:Checking:Event:B              $jk.lm    $total4
>                      <total>                             $nop.qr    $total4
>
>
> So I run the same register command twice, once without -n and with -n
> and then try to line them up (or hand edit).
> Thanks!
>    -Doug
>
> P.S. I'd really really like to have subtotals for the 3rd level
> accounts (configurable as to how deep to go to summarize) for each
> entry, but one step at a time. :-)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 22:57, Craig Earls <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Can you post an example of what you want to see?  I have never used 2.6
> and
> > don't know the options, but I am pretty good with 3.0 format strings.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 19:41, Doug Philips <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm still using 2.6, but if this can be done in 3, I'll upgrade! I've
> >> looked over the docs from ledger-cli.org/docs.html and can't seem to
> >> find what I'm looking for...
> >
> > --
> > Craig, Corona De Tucson, AZ
> > enderw88.wordpress.com
>



-- 
Craig, Corona De Tucson, AZ
enderw88.wordpress.com

Reply via email to