>>>>> John Rakestraw <[email protected]> writes:
> When I first started using this string, I'm quite sure but not absolutely > certain that the %(code) entry produced the check number when present, but > nothing at all for entries with no check number. However, after a recent > update, the entry produces a check number when present, but "(null)" for > entries with no check number. This is a bug. Null values should represent as the empty string in interpolations. John
