I wrote too soon earlier, Ledger-mode depends on numerical months in many, many places that aren't immediately obvious. I would like to implement this, but it is way down on my priority list.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Harshad RJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Zack Williams <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > 2013-Feb-27 is far more easier to parse by a human than 2013-2-27 >> >> "easier to parse by human" is subjective - it isn't for me. > > > Sorry for generalizing; yes, it need not be applicable to all. > > To be clear, what I am suggesting is, in the input file there can be two > ways to enter a date. > > YYYY-MM-DD > or > YYYY-month-DD (where "month" is defined in a directive) > > The latter is significantly more readable to me, and is consistent with the > output format of ledger. > >> >> An alphanumeric sort will also not work properly with this > > > I am not sure what "sort" you are referring to. The dates would still be > treated as dates; it is just a change in the parser that I am proposing. > When "2013-Feb-27" is parsed, it can be recorded as "2013-2-27" in the AST. > > -- > Harshad RJ > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ledger" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- Craig, Corona De Tucson, AZ enderw88.wordpress.com -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
