On May 23, 2013, at 1:29 AM, "John Wiegley" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think I am ready now to make a formal release of 3.0. My question to Craig > is, is the documentation and ledger-mode ready for such a release? My > question to others: can you verify that you believe the current state of > 'master' is ready for such a release?
Bugs #784/#787 are important for me. With the latest explanation, I think that solving #784 would solve #787. But I admit I have a "more than 2 minutes" workaround. Not blocking for 3.0. For #784, as suggested, I will open this weekend a feature request. On Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:17:40 PM UTC+2, Craig Earls wrote: > > I think the documentation is acceptable. It certainly isn't complete, but > I think it is very useable. The biggest weakness is still the value > expression section. > Same opinion than Craig (acceptable, incomplete, value expression is biggest weakness). Anyway, acceptable for 3.0. > ledger-mode is ready to go. > I reported many bugs about new ledger mode (almost all solved now), but I wonder if it it widely used? New ledger mode is recent. Is is stable enough? Bug #915 has just been closed as WONTFIX by Craig. This is, I believe, the same bug as #957. This is a regression compared to old ledger mode. I would really appreciate any little fix on this one. Some people this week complained on IRC about new ledger mode (if I remember well, several bugs, one related to undo), but to my knowledge, bugs have not been entered in Bugzilla. Makes me wonder if old ledger mode should be kept, even if new ledger mode has many advantages. Will be really happy when 3.0 will be published, Thierry -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
