On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Martin Michlmayr <[email protected]> wrote:
> * Zack Williams <[email protected]> [2014-05-13 06:55]: > > John W. did mention something about "commodity notes" a while back, > > but I'm not sure if that made it in. > > They have been there for a long time: > > 2014-05-13 * Test foo 1 > A 1 AAA [2014-05-13] (foo 1) @@ $10.00 > B > > 2014-05-13 * Test foo 2 > A 1 AAA [2014-05-13] (foo 2) @@ $10.00 > B > > > $ ledger -f d bal A --lots > 1 AAA {$10} [2014/05/13] (foo 1) > 1 AAA {$10} [2014/05/13] (foo 2) A > > $ ledger -f d bal A --lot-notes > 1 AAA (foo 1) > 1 AAA (foo 2) A > Is there any benefit in having both the date and a string to identify a lot? I'm currently using an optional date to identify lots, but this got me thinking, maybe it would make sense to generalize this to just a string.... -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
