I will try to figure this out this week

On Sunday, November 2, 2014, David Glasser <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've been seeing these symptoms too, but haven't had the time to
> investigate or report.
>
> --dave
> On Nov 2, 2014 8:45 AM, "Stefano Zacchiroli" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:25:12PM +1000, Paul W. Rankin wrote:
>> > The problems are myriad, but I'll try to summarise:
>>
>> FWIW, I'm also experiencing several highlighting issues with ledger-mode
>> 3.1. Some of them which I believe haven't yet been mentioned in this
>> thread (for info: I'm using Emacs 24.4, with graphical frames):
>>
>> - transient mark mode (AKA "selection") has become invisible within
>>   transactions; it seems it is using the same color pattern used by
>>   ledger-mode to highlight individual transactions
>>
>> - the use of alternate dates (e.g., 2014/01/01=2014/01/02) inhibits the
>>   proper highlighting of date, payees, and posting. For instance, in the
>>   attached altdate.ledger, the second transaction has all text in green
>>   (except the payee and "*" which are in black), whereas the other
>>   transactions has the date in red, the payee in green, and the postings
>>   in blue
>>
>>   also, the very useful "bold red" highlighting which is usually
>>   associated to pending transactions doesn't seem to work on
>>   transactions with alternate dates
>>
>> - the highlighting of files containing only account directives (but
>>   might actually apply also to check directives) has become bizarre. For
>>   instance, on the attached accounts.ledger the highlighting seems now
>>   to follow the cursor, rather than always highlighting a whole account
>>   directive, including "note" sub-directives and corresponding comments
>>
>>   Also, according to conditions I haven't yet narrowed down, the
>>   directives are either all rendered in green (which seems weird per se,
>>   as there is no specific highlighting of the "account" keyword, for
>>   example), or some in green and some in blank. It seems to depend on
>>   where the cursor is at the time of a revert-buffer command, which
>>   makes no sense to me
>>
>> Hope this helps, and thanks a lot for maintaining ledger-mode!, I don't
>> know what I'd do without it :-)
>>
>> Cheers.
>> --
>> Stefano Zacchiroli  . . . . . . .  [email protected] . . . . o . . . o . o
>> Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
>> Former Debian Project Leader  . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o .
>> « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
>>
>> --
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Ledger" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected]
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ledger-cli%[email protected]');>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>  --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ledger" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ledger-cli%[email protected]');>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


-- 
Craig, Corona De Tucson, AZ
enderw88.wordpress.com

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ledger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to