>>>>> Andrew Maffei <[email protected]> writes: > wondering if an intermediate step might be to modify ledger to support > iso8601 typed metadata? I looked at boost and noticed there are the 2 > functions: to_iso_string and from_iso_string that could be used to handle > the following transaction-level metadata declaration.
> ; TimeStamp:: [20020131T235959] This is certainly possible, however none Ledger's date-based logic will be able to use this timestamp. It'll just truncate the extra information when it goes to use it. And you were right before, 1s vs. 1ns resolution represents no difference in difficulty. > If less time required, could you estimate a WAG( Wild A-- Guess) for > level-of-effort for this John? Thx. I don't think it will take you as far as you want to go. John -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
