On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:06:39AM -0800, John Wiegley wrote: > To be fair, it's not really Google Docs that enabled it, but Martin's amazing > capacity for going into detail in this design space. I credit him as a human > being, and not the technology, for why beancount is so well and thoroughly > documented.
Yeah, absolutely, thanks for speaking my mind. That said, I've no doubts myself that the ease of commenting/suggesting changes that Google Docs offer played a role in the amount of contribution Martin got. But it is very hard to factor out the initial quality of the doc to properly measure the alleged "competitive advantage" offered by Google Docs. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . [email protected] . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . . . . @zacchiro . . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
