>>>>> "MC" == Michael Cooper <myth...@gmail.com> writes:
MC> It seems that the automated transaction has not taken affect when the MC> balance assertion is evaluated. I consider this a bug. Looking at the code, it seems we handle balance assertions right away, before automated transactions are processed. The problem with reversing the order is this: The ordering of the postings in the transaction is significant. If all the automated transactions's postings just get added to the end (which is what happens), it won't change the behavior to what you're expecting. It seems like what you want to happen is that the automated transaction's posting get inserted immediately *before* the posting the triggered them. This is the only way they could effect the balance assertions, but it seems a bit of a strange place to insert them... -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ledger-cli+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
