Dana petak, 8. rujna 2017. u 15:06:38 UTC+2, korisnik John Wiegley napisao
je:
>
> >>>>> "IS" == Ivan Senji <[email protected] <javascript:>> writes:
>
> IS> Any idea what I am doing wrong or missunderstanding?
>
> Ledger's logic regarding revaluation entries is perhaps too simple: They
> occur
> whenever there is an "event" in the timestream. In your case, you have
> two
> events: a transaction involving HRK on 3/1, and a pricing entry on 4/1.
>
So prices in the form "P 2017/04/01 EUR 8 HRK" are not events?
>
> The fact that the price of FUND changes on 2/1 isn't taken into account,
> because you're asking about valuations in term of HRK, not FUND.
>
> Perhaps the algorithm here needs improvement, but it's not immediately
> clear
> to me what the rule would be. If we start introducing this indirect types
> of
> changes, it could become quite complex to know when to report such
> entries.
>
Thanks again for trying to understand my problem and help.
In trying to figure out things I came across this:
2017/03/03 * Some other EUR transaction defining EUR->HRK conversion
Expenses:EurExpenses
Assets:Checking -100 EUR @ 6.1 HRK
2017/03/07 * Some other EUR transaction defining EUR->HRK conversion
Expenses:EurExpenses
Assets:Checking -100 EUR {6.2 HRK}
These two transactions do not behave the same. The first one causes
revaluation in my example and the second one does not.
Similar for prices:
P 2017/04/01 EUR 8 HRK
does not cause revaluation of FUND in HRK but something like
2017/04/04 exchange rate
test1 1 EUR @ 8.1 HRK
test2
works.
These seem like they could be workarounds for my problem but I am not sure
yet.
Thanks.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ledger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
