Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> --- Chris Travers wrote:
>> If we rewrite the entire application at once, I am quite afraid it
>> will never be completed simply because it is such a big task.
>
> I agree with this, a rewrite with redesign [1] would take way too long for any
> new or SL user to remain interested in SMB.
Bah! I disagree completely. As long as we maintain the stable branch it
would likely not effect us at all.
The fact that people were even willing to run SL speaks to that.
The rest I don't have much of a comment on ;)
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
