On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 02:01:25PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > In the realm of general structure, I'm uncomfortable with the fact that SMB > does not have a GL *table*. While there's nothing innaccurate with doing the > P&L on the fly by adding up AR and AP, it's both inefficient and does not > provide us with a cross-checking layer in the database which would make data > errors easy to detect and resolve. So I'd like to explore adding a GL table > to the data model.
There is a GL table, it's just that hardly anything uses it, prefering to add up the other tables and storing its values in the acc_trans table. One of my test instances has an entry in it from when I told the system that it was the year end. -- Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
