On Jan 16, 2008 10:17 AM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:51:27 -0800
> "Chris Travers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 15, 2008 10:06 PM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:31:50 -0800
> > > "Chris Travers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would like to suggest that *some* but not all testers work with
> > > > DBD::Pg 2.0.0 while others work with 1.49. For people wanting to
> > > > test /trunk (i.e. 1.3.x) please write back to the list which
> > > > version you want to test with.
> > > >
> > > > At some point we should probably require 2.0.0 or higher so as to
> > > > avoid too much duplicate code....
> > >
> > > We should not use any 2.0 specific features in 1.3.
> >
> >
> > I figure 1.4 is a good timeline for 2.0 requirements, depending on
> > how quickly it is adopted by distros.
>
> We need to be careful there. RHEL 5 will never have it for example.
And at that point we will have to decide whether to maintain duplicate code
for a very small number of users or simply package an RPM of it as a
prerequisite.
I would generally vote for the latter. We already do this for some
prerequisites for Fedora and Debian users.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
