On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Luke wrote: > Is there any way to provide basic functionality similar to 1.2, and use > all of this as an LSMB module? > > (That's probably already the plan, but if you're backing this with a type, > then maybe not...)
Clarification: I was thinking along the lines of "optionalization" rather than "modularization", as it could be a required module as opposed to part of core. I want it to be optional. Luke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-devel mailing list Ledger-smb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel
