Howson is very lightweight hardly a captains innings Regards Wayne Richard Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
>Not sure what others think but I think we are by far the most lively team and >have the better players on the ball. I think this is our best team (maybe an >argument about O'Dea). > >Say you want about White's defensive abilities but his pace got us out of >trouble even if it was a pen. > >2 players who I want to see more from - Howson , unlike his partner Clayton, >hasn't taken the game by then scruff of the neck. Second player is McCormack - >he's done ok but his play at times is too slack and he loses possession too >easily. > >It was a really bad penalty miss because I think we would have gone on to win >..... We still might but we've got it all to do. > >Very happy with our shape, our energy, our skill and the way are going for >this game. I think we still might suffer from Big Sam's set pieces at some >point. > > >Sent from my iPad > >On 21 Aug 2011, at 13:45, Andy Pyzer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Gradel missed wide - arse >> >> Andy Pyzer >>> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 13:01:03 +0100 >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [LU] Saviour - this old debate again (hit delete if you don't >>> want o read it) >>> >>> Will all this back being discussed again I'm surprised that there hasn't >>> been any mention on this list about the Dispatches program that was shown a >>> couple of weeks ago, especially as LU were mentioned several times as being >>> "available". >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Graham White >>> >>> --- On Wed, 17/8/11, Rick Duniec <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> From: Rick Duniec <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [LU] Saviour - this old debate again (hit delete if you don't >>> want o read it) >>> To: [email protected] >>> Date: Wednesday, 17 August, 2011, 16:59 >>> >>> >>> There isn't much point in my responding to convoluted nonsense so I'll >>> leave your contrived points there and the creditors didn't have any say in >>> the matter. They didn't get a choice in the final sale. >>> >>> As I understand it you are saying that an asset stripper could have bought >>> the club, kept it going and playing in the league, and sold off the best >>> players as the opportunity arose. That appears to be your definition. >>> You are quite right of course that this is possible. I have been watching >>> it happen ever since KPMG sold the club back to KB. >>> >>> It is impossible to say if KB saved us or not when you don't say what he >>> saved us from. Tell us what he saved us from and it may be a lot easier to >>> see if it is true or not. You are hiding behind a vague concept of being >>> "saved". >>> >>> Oh, and he didn't "save us" the first time around either. >>> >>> If you just want to find somebody to argue with please find somebody else. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leedslist mailing list >>> Info and options: >>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >>> >>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leedslist mailing list >>> Info and options: >>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >>> >>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leedslist mailing list >> Info and options: >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) >_______________________________________________ >Leedslist mailing list >Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > >MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
