Agree with Rich, we were by far the better team until the OG. West Ham are just 
a set piece team

> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:50:41 +0100
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LU] 1 - 0 missed pen
> 
> Howson is very lightweight hardly a captains innings 
> Regards
> Wayne
> 
> Richard Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >Not sure what others think but I think we are by far the most lively team 
> >and have the better players on the ball. I think this is our best team 
> >(maybe an argument about O'Dea).
> >
> >Say you want about White's defensive abilities but his pace got us out of 
> >trouble even if it was a pen.
> >
> >2 players who I want to see more from - Howson , unlike his partner Clayton, 
> >hasn't taken the game by then scruff of the neck. Second player is McCormack 
> >- he's done ok but his play at times is too slack and he loses possession 
> >too easily.
> >
> >It was a really bad penalty miss because I think we would have gone on to 
> >win ..... We still might but we've got it all to do.
> >
> >Very happy with our shape, our energy, our skill and the way are going for 
> >this game. I think we still might suffer from Big Sam's set pieces at some 
> >point.
> >
> >
> >Sent from my iPad
> >
> >On 21 Aug 2011, at 13:45, Andy Pyzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> 
> >> Gradel missed wide - arse
> >> 
> >> Andy Pyzer
> >>> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 13:01:03 +0100
> >>> From: [email protected]
> >>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Re: [LU] Saviour - this old debate again (hit delete if you 
> >>> don't    want o read it)
> >>> 
> >>> Will all this back being discussed again I'm surprised that there hasn't 
> >>> been any mention on this list about the Dispatches program that was shown 
> >>> a couple of weeks ago, especially as LU were mentioned several times as 
> >>> being "available".
> >>> 
> >>> Cheers
> >>> 
> >>> Graham White
> >>> 
> >>> --- On Wed, 17/8/11, Rick Duniec <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> From: Rick Duniec <[email protected]>
> >>> Subject: Re: [LU] Saviour - this old debate again (hit delete if you 
> >>> don't want o read it)
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Date: Wednesday, 17 August, 2011, 16:59
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> There isn't much point in my responding to convoluted nonsense so I'll 
> >>> leave your contrived points there and the creditors didn't have any say 
> >>> in the matter. They didn't get a choice in the final sale. 
> >>> 
> >>> As I understand it you are saying that an asset stripper could have 
> >>> bought the club, kept it going and playing in the league, and sold off 
> >>> the best players as the opportunity arose. That appears to be your 
> >>> definition.
> >>> You are quite right of course that this is possible. I have been watching 
> >>> it happen ever since KPMG sold the club back to KB.
> >>> 
> >>> It is impossible to say if KB saved us or not when you don't say what he 
> >>> saved us from. Tell us what he saved us from and it may be a lot easier 
> >>> to see if it is true or not. You are hiding behind a vague concept of 
> >>> being "saved".
> >>> 
> >>> Oh, and he didn't "save us" the first time around either.
> >>> 
> >>> If you just want to find somebody to argue with please find somebody else.
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leedslist mailing list
> >>> Info and options: 
> >>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
> >>> 
> >>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leedslist mailing list
> >>> Info and options: 
> >>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
> >>> 
> >>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
> >>                         
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leedslist mailing list
> >> Info and options: 
> >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
> >> 
> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
> >_______________________________________________
> >Leedslist mailing list
> >Info and options: 
> >http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> >To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
> >
> >MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: 
> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
> 
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
                                          
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]

MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)

Reply via email to