Are the cuts hitting Yorkshire the hardest? As far as I knew the cuts (in public sector) hit London the hardest, or are you talking about Gordon's recession/banking crisis?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Heath Sent: 10 October 2011 15:17 To: Matt Anderson Cc: list leedslist Subject: Re: [LU] Falling crowds And 4 of the 6 biggest drops are clubs from Yorkshire. Where the cuts.........you know, the "we are all in this together" cuts........are hitting hardest? On 10 October 2011 16:28, Matt Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking at it the 3 +ve teams were all optimistic at the start of the > season hence decent ST sales perhaps??? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] > On > Behalf Of Nigel Sykes > Sent: 10 October 2011 14:00 > To: 'list leedslist' > Subject: Re: [LU] Falling crowds > > I thought I'd do the journo's job for them and look it up. Don't know > how accurate these figures are (they're from www.emfootball.co.uk), > but here are the differences between the average gates for the > (admittedly small sample > of) home games in the Championship so far this year, compared with > those from last year, sorted in order of the biggest drop to the biggest gain: > > Team AveCrowd Last Season Diff > Hull City 18077 21168 -17.1% > Leeds United 23646 27299 -15.4% > Barnsley 10424 11855 -13.7% > Bristol City 13171 14604 -10.9% > Crystal Palace 13867 15351 -10.7% > Doncaster Rovers 9528 10258 -7.7% > Portsmouth 14762 15707 -6.4% > Reading 16665 17681 -6.1% > Ipswich Town 18809 19614 -4.3% > Burnley 14421 14930 -3.5% > Cardiff City 22505 23193 -3.1% > Millwall 12090 12438 -2.9% > Leicester City 23032 23666 -2.8% > Watford 12982 13151 -1.3% > Coventry City 16121 16309 -1.2% > Derby County 26833 26022 3.0% > Nottingham Forest 24028 23274 3.1% > Middlesbrough 17731 16268 8.3% > > As you can see, the trend is mostly downwards (only 3 have higher > average gates and that may well have more to do with whom they have > played so far than anything - or not). > > But the Leeds drop is certainly significant, and deffo above average. > > Nigel > > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: > http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1410 / Virus Database: 1522/3943 - Release Date: > 10/07/11 > > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: > http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
