"those who reckon we are doing well and are pro Bates " wow... great logic there. NOT.
let's get this done: who on the list is PRO bates? Sent from my iPhone On 24 Jan 2012, at and 21:58, DAVID NATTAN <david.nat...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > YesNo problem with the number of points gained in January BUT you have to > factor in that we were 1 0 down in each of the 3 games whilst it was 11 v 11. > We only actually got any goals (and won any points) when the opposition were > down to ten men.In each of the 3 games the dismissal came early on and in > none of them was the red card given for preventing a goal by us - Ipswich > would have been on own goal if anything- > I have said after both the home games that the fact that we scored so late on > does show a commitment from the players and a belief in the manager. > It appears there is a bit of a split on the list - those who reckon we are > doing well and are pro Bates are those who for the most part do not tend to > go to games, whereas those of us who are more downbeat and pessimistic are > those who go to ER. (with obvious exceptions Dr Mike and his MS and anti > Grayson stuff) > A bit like the Becchio situation - those of us who watch him regularly know > that he is very limited (but has been effective) whilst those who only see > the goals on TV, read the scores think he is great. > This is NOT a 'real fan' argument or in any way meant as a slight on those of > you who do not go to games for whatever reason > Dave > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org > > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
