If you love leeds you can't possibly want to see the club perpetually abused as a plaything for persons of dubious character. Our recent ownership history reads like a litany of scumbags: Richmond - schemer Morris - convicted Bates - schemer Nooruddin - schemer Cellino - convicted and you think this is ok? The 'takeover' has been ongoing since November so why can't you consider the Barnsley game as being attributed to the takeover? Is it purely coincidence that before November everything in the garden was rosy? Let your imagination digest what 'interference' from the prospective owners means. This isn't interference from the owners but someone the owners want to sell to.... Cheers Paul
On 1 Feb 2014 10:13, "rhys hodge" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes I will admit I reside in New Zealand, you cannot get much further away, however you there is so much emotion being shown. I admit being so far away i can't appreciate that, however my support and love of Leeds United is not any less than that off those that live in Leeds. Being in New Zealand I am probably away from the emotion of the situation, however I have been very frustrated by recent results and those cannot all be attributed to the takeover (eg Barnsley ) _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] John 'Grampa' Sykes Rest In Peace old lad 28th Oct 1938 - 12 Nov 2013 MARCHING ON TOGETHER
