Totally agree, I can only see one outcome if we get Town in the play offs.
I think Town are good enough for auto promotion .
> On 6 Feb 2017, at 12:17, {broken-address} John Lee
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Given what I saw of Uddersfield against Brighton and us, the evidence doesn't
> suggest that would be a draw we should encourage - let someone else knock
> them out. I think Rich W wondered how Wagner had got all those players to
> Huddersfield - a very good question, given how good they look in an
> attacking, entertaining way, and who are defensively not bad either? We have
> some improvement to make before starting to entertain any thoughts of revenge
> - passing to our own players would be a start!
> PS I changed the subject line - work and all that!
>
>
> From: Ian Murray <[email protected]>
> To: Nicholas Armit <[email protected]>; Simon McNally <[email protected]>;
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017, 11:18
> Subject: Re: [LU] Dog bothering cunts
>
> Great point.
>
> Also unlikely Huddersfax will go up automatically so there's a good chance we
> will get a chance of revenge - a la Billy 'job done' Davis!
>
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit <[email protected]>
> Date: 05/02/2017 22:42 (GMT+08:00)
> To: Nicholas Armit <[email protected]>, Simon McNally <[email protected]>,
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LU] Dog bothering cunts
>
> Next four are totally winnable. 9 points out of that and I think playoffs are
> close to nailed on.
>
> From: Nicholas Armit <[email protected]>
> To: Nicholas Armit <[email protected]>; Simon McNally <[email protected]>;
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 9:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [LU] Dog bothering cunts
>
> Twat is blaming Monk. Saying it was not acceptable.
>
> From: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit
> <[email protected]>
> To: Simon McNally <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 9:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [LU] Dog bothering cunts
>
> I thought Hernandez was ok....Bridcutt had a bad game and Viera just seemed
> to run out of steam.
> Shame we couldn't put more pressure on them. They looked a good team but were
> not world beaters.
>
> From: Simon McNally <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 9:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [LU] Dog bothering cunts
>
> Barrow bottled a couple of fifty fifties which I don't like to see.
> Hernandez was poor today and both he and bridcutt gave the ball away more
> than I've ever seen them.
> We seemed to want to take an extra touch, especially viera and it kept
> putting us under pressure.
> Just seen Wagner being interviewed, he's an unbearably smug cunt. Deserves a
> good hiding
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 5 Feb 2017, at 14:13, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Thought Pedraza looked good and almost won it for us with his first touch -
>> plus if he had not dived he may have helped us get another at the endBarrow
>> was crap (yes, much too early to write him off but first impressions not
>> good)
>> Need to send Colin back home with a hammering next week now
>> 3 points from 2 away games in a week is not that bad
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> From: Richard Naef <[email protected]>
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2017, 14:06
>> Subject: Re: [LU] Dog bothering cunts
>>
>>
>>> Disappointed with how we kept giving the ball away cheaply but thought we
>>> done enough to get a point.
>>> Fair play to Monk for barging into Wagner - I'd have chinned him for
>>> running down the pitch like that.
>>> Hope the wanker gets a ban
>>
>> Not sure bringing on the 2 newbies in this type of game was a good idea.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leedslist mailing list
>> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>>
>>
>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leedslist mailing list
>> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>>
>>
>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>
>
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>
>
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>
>
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>
>
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
>
>
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
MARCHING ON TOGETHER
