You might be right Dave, but then again if they sustain this, then Rich will
possibly be right too, as I can see one of the top two faltering.
I'm not sure their defence is bad either - we looked no great shakes against
it, and neither did Brighton.
I'll be very happy indeed if we go up in an automatic promotion place, but
experience tells you a nervy play-off awaits :-(
From: David W <davidwool...@gmail.com>
To: {broken-address} Richard Walker
<richleed...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org>
Cc: John Lee <bruvvalee...@yahoo.co.uk>; "leedslist@gn.apc.org"
<leedslist@gn.apc.org>
Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017, 13:05
Subject: Re: [LU] Uddersfield
They're at their high water mark at the moment - they will slip from this
level. Their defence isn't all that and they play a very dangerous high line at
set pieces that will get them in trouble (unfortunately Hernandez's delivery
was unusually poor at set pieces yesterday).
We're going up in 2nd!
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:53 PM, {broken-address} Richard Walker
<richleed...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org> wrote:
Totally agree, I can only see one outcome if we get Town in the play offs.
I think Town are good enough for auto promotion .
> On 6 Feb 2017, at 12:17, {broken-address} John Lee
> <bruvvalee...@yahoo.co.uk.is- broken.gn.apc.org> wrote:
>
> Given what I saw of Uddersfield against Brighton and us, the evidence doesn't
> suggest that would be a draw we should encourage - let someone else knock
> them out. I think Rich W wondered how Wagner had got all those players to
> Huddersfield - a very good question, given how good they look in an
> attacking, entertaining way, and who are defensively not bad either? We have
> some improvement to make before starting to entertain any thoughts of revenge
> - passing to our own players would be a start!
> PS I changed the subject line - work and all that!
>
>
> From: Ian Murray <ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com>
> To: Nicholas Armit <arm...@yahoo.com>; Simon McNally <simon_mcna...@sky.com>;
> "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
> Cc: "leedslist@gn.apc.org" <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017, 11:18
> Subject: Re: [LU] Dog bothering cunts
>
> Great point.
>
> Also unlikely Huddersfax will go up automatically so there's a good chance we
> will get a chance of revenge - a la Billy 'job done' Davis!
>
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit <arm...@yahoo.com-is-broken. gn.apc.org>
> Date: 05/02/2017 22:42 (GMT+08:00)
> To: Nicholas Armit <arm...@yahoo.com>, Simon McNally <simon_mcna...@sky.com>,
> nat...@sky.com
> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: Re: [LU] Dog bothering cunts
>
> Next four are totally winnable. 9 points out of that and I think playoffs are
> close to nailed on.
>
> From: Nicholas Armit <arm...@yahoo.com>
> To: Nicholas Armit <arm...@yahoo.com>; Simon McNally <simon_mcna...@sky.com>;
> "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
> Cc: "leedslist@gn.apc.org" <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 9:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [LU] Dog bothering cunts
>
> Twat is blaming Monk. Saying it was not acceptable.
>
> From: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit <arm...@yahoo.com-is-broken.
>gn.apc.org>
> To: Simon McNally <simon_mcna...@sky.com>; "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
> Cc: "leedslist@gn.apc.org" <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 9:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [LU] Dog bothering cunts
>
> I thought Hernandez was ok....Bridcutt had a bad game and Viera just seemed
> to run out of steam.
> Shame we couldn't put more pressure on them. They looked a good team but were
> not world beaters.
>
> From: Simon McNally <simon_mcna...@sky.com>
> To: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
> Cc: "leedslist@gn.apc.org" <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 9:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [LU] Dog bothering cunts
>
> Barrow bottled a couple of fifty fifties which I don't like to see.
> Hernandez was poor today and both he and bridcutt gave the ball away more
> than I've ever seen them.
> We seemed to want to take an extra touch, especially viera and it kept
> putting us under pressure.
> Just seen Wagner being interviewed, he's an unbearably smug cunt. Deserves a
> good hiding
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 5 Feb 2017, at 14:13, "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thought Pedraza looked good and almost won it for us with his first touch -
>> plus if he had not dived he may have helped us get another at the endBarrow
>> was crap (yes, much too early to write him off but first impressions not
>> good)
>> Need to send Colin back home with a hammering next week now
>> 3 points from 2 away games in a week is not that bad
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> From: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co. uk>
>> To: "leedslist@gn.apc.org" <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2017, 14:06
>> Subject: Re: [LU] Dog bothering cunts
>>
>>
>>> Disappointed with how we kept giving the ball away cheaply but thought we
>>> done enough to get a point.
>>> Fair play to Monk for barging into Wagner - I'd have chinned him for
>>> running down the pitch like that.
>>> Hope the wanker gets a ban
>>
>> Not sure bringing on the 2 newbies in this type of game was a good idea.
>> ______________________________ _________________
>> Leedslist mailing list
>> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org. uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
>> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc. org
>>
>>
>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________ _________________
>> Leedslist mailing list
>> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org. uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
>> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc. org
>>
>>
>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
>
> ______________________________ _________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org. uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc. org
>
>
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
>
>
>
> ______________________________ _________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org. uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc. org
>
>
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________ _________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org. uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc. org
>
>
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
> ______________________________ _________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org. uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc. org
>
>
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
>
>
>
> ______________________________ _________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org. uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc. org
>
>
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER
______________________________ _________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org. uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc. org
MARCHING ON TOGETHER
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
MARCHING ON TOGETHER
