Just to keep this all going, as it seems about the only active thread in this list. Where does Thirkers now stand in all this? Is he banned too or is his rant all fine? I'm not really bothered either way, just felt like lighting some blue touch paper and standing back since it's just about Guy Fawkes time......
Hat on, Jeremy ________________________________ From: Leedslist <[email protected]> on behalf of Neil <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 9:01:35 AM To: E Walsh Cc: [email protected]; Rob Heath Subject: Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) I don’t contribute much, but I think you should stay. That post was wonderful. If Heath’s book is as well written as your post I will buy it. It was not nice, but it was funny as hell. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 27, 2017, at 8:59 AM, E Walsh <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Personally I think you should stay. I enjoy your comments. Ed Sent from my iPhone On 27 Oct 2017, at 13:45, Michael Benjamin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I don't know where this stands; I may be repeating myself but: 1. I accept all responsibility. Heath, this time, was completely innocent of any wrongdoings. He should definitely not be banned. 2. Suffice to say; I had no idea he had written a book. I thought it was (another) dig at me. I was wrong and deserve banning. 3. TBF, as much as I intensely dislike Heath, I wish his forage into writing every success. Yes, you should read his book and give feedback. 4. So, I wander off into the horizon knowing my last act was much to do about nothing and extremely bizarre even by my exacting standards. But by God, I did it great 😊 All the best to all of you. MOT, but without me. Michael -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Thorpe [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 27 October 2017 15:12 To: 'Richard Walker' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 'Peter Castlehouse' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Michael Benjamin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 'Rob Heath' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) I second getting them back on. From the initial flame through all Dr Mikes responses, bloody hilarious. Fabulous cheap entertainment. -----Original Message----- From: Leedslist [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of {broken-address} Richard Walker Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 07:59 To: Peter Castlehouse; 'Michael Benjamin'; 'Rob Heath' Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) throwing people off the list even for Non-LU posts ? Most entertaining posts for a while from Mad MIke IMO. Get them back on. From: Peter Castlehouse <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: 'Michael Benjamin' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 'Rob Heath' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017, 7:18 Subject: Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the poi _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> FLAME WARS 'R US _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] FLAME WARS 'R US _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] FLAME WARS 'R US
