Nah, obvs he was aiming for the goal..... Sent from my Mobile.
________________________________ From: Leedslist <leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org> on behalf of Nick <n...@6haroldplace.co.uk> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 3:55:01 PM To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Subject: [LU] Fwd: Kalvin Phillips' averageness in stats. that 60 yarder for Bamford to spoon just wide on Saturday was Hoddlesque (without the god bothering) > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> > Subject: Re: [LU] Kalvin Phillips' averageness in stats. > Date: 14 August 2019 at 15:39:30 BST > To: Nicholas Armit <arm...@yahoo.com>, Richard Walker > <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>, "leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org)" > <leedslist@gn.apc.org> > > If you don't try difficult things and occasionally fail (16%) then what's the > point. Perhaps some of the 16% did cause problems but that's what the other > 10 players are for and Bielsa isn't going to criticise him for that. > > I think Dave made the point that comparing Batty to Macca was pointless as > there attempts at passing were of completely different types. KP is a > defensive midfielder, very little gets through BUT he also sets up counter > attacks and plays defence splitting passes. If you think he's average your > are entitled to your opinion, but I just think that's plain wrong and not > born out by the facts of last season or the beginning of this, maybe you need > to amend your expectations of a top championship DM? Who are you comparing > him with? > > Sent from my Mobile. > > ________________________________ > From: Nicholas Armit <arm...@yahoo.com> > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 3:07:22 PM > To: Richard Walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>; leeds list > (leedslist@gn.apc.org) <leedslist@gn.apc.org>; Richard Naef > <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> > Subject: Re: [LU] Kalvin Phillips' averageness in stats. > > I recommend you watch again Richard and actually look for the passes he gave > away. They were problematic. > > Phillips has come on leaps and bounds but he does have issues. > > Nick > > On Wednesday, August 14, 2019, 09:56:57 AM EDT, Richard Naef > <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> wrote: > > > LOL. 15 long passes, 84 Medium and Short. > > Sent from my Mobile. > > ________________________________ > From: Nicholas Armit <arm...@yahoo.com> > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 2:47:35 PM > To: Richard Walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>; leeds list > (leedslist@gn.apc.org) <leedslist@gn.apc.org>; Richard Naef > <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> > Subject: Re: [LU] Kalvin Phillips' averageness in stats. > > Most of the game Phillips sat in midfield with noone anywhere near him. > During the game I told the boy I could sit there and do that too and give the > ball away less (some hyperbole there of course). With Rich a bit here, stats > do not tell everything. 100 short passes looks great and is not necessarily a > bad thing but when 4/5 through balls go straight to the other side and sets > up their attack there is nothing wrong with pointing that out. > > Nick > > On Wednesday, August 14, 2019, 05:48:08 AM EDT, Richard Naef > <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> wrote: > > > I’m definitely a snowflake and I hug trees and don’t wash regularly, but when > deciding on things I prefer facts to opinions, which of course you are > entitled to have and express on an open forum. Of course you don’t like > facts and stats that contradict your opinions, who does, but just ignoring > them and accusing others of getting upset is a bit rich (pun intended). If > you think 16% is “frequent” in the context of a fast flowing match against > committed (albeit limited) opponents, can you give us an example of the stats > you would expect from an ABOVE average player, one that would reduce the pain > you say you feel from watching one of our most improved and committed > players? C’mon Rich, we all know your schtick on here & Twitter is to be > angry and contrarian to wind people up, but you’re amongst friends here, just > once, just for us, crack and smile and gives us a WHOOP – promise we won’t > tell anyone. > > From: Richard Walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk<mailto:richleed...@yahoo.co.uk>> > Sent: 14 August 2019 10:37 > To: leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org<mailto:leedslist@gn.apc.org>) > <leedslist@gn.apc.org<mailto:leedslist@gn.apc.org>>; Richard Naef > <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk<mailto:rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk>> > Subject: Re: [LU] Kalvin Phillips' averageness in stats. > > stats are stats and looking at those they mean nothing. For instance they > don't include his shot that went over the stand in the first half. > > I'd prefer to go with what I saw and overall I thought Philips did ok with a > definite improvement in the second half with one or two really good passes. > > First half though, he was dreadful. His passing was all over the place, > frequently giving the ball away (that must have been the 16% inaccurate > passes). The most worrying thing is when he got done for pace by Towell and > you could see he just didn't have the acceleration to recover. > > I like Philips, he's a local lad and he's doing ok at this moment in time but > let's have a reality check. Some fans are saying he could be England captain > whereas I think he's a good championship player and would struggle in the PL. > > It makes me laugh when fans get all upset when you point out a player's > faults in a match and get all abusive and start crying particular on Twitter > however there are 1 or 2 snowflakes on here. Come on, grow up FFS. > > On Wednesday, 14 August 2019, 09:01:10 BST, Richard Naef > <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk<mailto:rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk><mailto:rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk<mailto:rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk>>> > wrote: > > > Kalvin Phillips vs. Salford City: > > 128 touches (most) 🌟 > 99 successful passes (most) 🌟 > 84% pass accuracy > 15 successful long passes > 5 ball recoveries > 2 chances created > 2 accurate crosses > 2 shots on-target > > Defensive midfielder. > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email > leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org<mailto:leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org><mailto:leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org<mailto:leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org>> > > > Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/ > > RIP Jimmy WAC-COE > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email > leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org<mailto:leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org> > > Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/ > > RIP Jimmy WAC-COE > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org > > Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/ > > RIP Jimmy WAC-COE _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/ RIP Jimmy WAC-COE _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/leedslist/ RIP Jimmy WAC-COE
