Bad enough that you're talking about cricket on here ...... Worse that you continue to consider it LU and not NON LU ......
The absolute worst is that you are disguising your cricket crap under the heading "Away from the Cricket....." - grrrrrr. (insert half a smiley here) Ossie ----Original Message Follows---- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected] Subject: Re: [LU] Away from the cricket...... Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:09:03 EDT >>He concluded that Vaughan's decision when to bat was shite and that there is a problem there.<< Was it a bad decision? Clearly we don't have the firepower to chase down a total - as the Sri Lanka game proved. Can you imagine that lot chasing down 350? But if our batsmen had been able to cope with SA's line & length pacemen they could have posted 250 or so batting first - which might have allowed us to put some pressure on when bowling. We were 110 for 3 after 30 overs - 7 an over in the last 20 would have given 250. Batting first was an attempt to bat to our "strengths", but it didn't come off because the batsmen played badly. Mark _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist it's a God awful small affair _________________________________________________________________ Message offline contacts without any fire risk! http://www.communicationevolved.com/en-ie/ _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist it's a God awful small affair
