Tim

it was actually 146 against Surrey when we tonked them in the Gillette Cup 
final. At the time I think it was the fastest century in a one day match. 
Here is the link:-

http://content-www.cricinfo.com/wisdencricketer/content/story/140933.html

Regards

Phill
:-)
>From: "Tim Leslie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [LU] Moving on ...
>Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:10:58 +0100 (BST)
>
>Not that many. Matthew Tait is a superb, world class 7's player but cannot
>make that impact at full test level. Not yet anyway. What was the argument
>again? I've had a tough mental day at work %-)
>
>Sir Geoffrey (Who, funnily enough, I bumped into at Headingley this
>morning!) was a damn fine 1 day player actually! I think he managed 147
>N.O. on one occasion!
>
> > And how many rugby players play at the top level both in test rugby &
> > sevens?
> >
> > Do you think Boycott would have been a good 1 day or 20/20 player?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Walker
> > Sent: 18 April 2007 18:21
> > To: Tim Leslie; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [LU] Moving on ...
> >
> >
> > "Vaughan is a shrewd tactician and a good leader. He
> > is also a fine Test batsman. However, his record as a
> > one-day cricketer speaks for itself, and he should not
> > be chosen again."
> >
> > It's this sort of bollocks that does my head in.
> > You're either a good batter and can play at the
> > highest level or you can't. Surely a 'fine test
> > batsmen' should be averaging more that 20 in this
> > world cup ???? All the Aussies are managing to do it
> > and even some of our batsmen who haved proved
> > themselves at test level recently have managed to
> > average over 50 (Collingwood and Pietersen). So to say
> > Vaughan can't bat at one day level is like saying
> > Wayne Rooney would be no good at 5-a-side. What a
> > joke. Why can't the cricketing commentators say it how
> > it is.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
>accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
>Leedslist mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
>it's a God awful small affair

_________________________________________________________________
Get Hotmail, News, Sport and Entertainment from MSN on your mobile.  
http://www.msn.txt4content.com/


_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. 
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
it's a God awful small affair

Reply via email to