Ermmm I think so, though I don't quite recall using those words... I believe
the quote you used was referring to the sale of the club, not Healey but it
transfers (if you'll pardon the pun) fairly well.

It's all, "mights" till after the fact. Any number of related circumstances,
whether there by design, or inadvertent can conspire to change the outcome
in a positive, or negative way.

Doing what you can (and sometimes doing/saying nothing) to maintain the
strongest possible bargaining position, is all important... Divulging
anything negative, about your position is rarely, if ever a smart move.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Humphries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 6:53 AM
To: 'Nigel Holcroft'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [LU] Wage deferrals - Healy + who?

So are you saying that even if Bates thought Healy was the devil's spawn and
didn't want to ever see him again, it might not actually make any difference
to the eventual sale price?

In other words, factors like the desire to have a player in your side or you
faced competition for his signature might be slightly more relevant?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Holcroft
Sent: 07 June 2007 19:53
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [LU] Wage deferrals - Healy + who?

Hmmmm, I believe you proved my point there..There are lots of factors which
can make a deal go through without the highest bidder winning. In this
particular case it was Bates' stacking the deck, in advance and then
manipulating circumstances to threaten others into thinking his was the only
choice they had..






_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. 
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org 

Reply via email to